*0012685080
*00520250331085055.2
*007cr
*008250331s2024    no     eo         0 eng
*00900000nam a22000005c 4500
*019  $bge
*035  $a(EXLNZ-47BIBSYS_NETWORK)999922703285302201
*035  $a(NO-DIMO)8b56b0df-b00d-4d0a-8aea-6ef688a5b64c
*035  $a(NO-LaBS)51475309(bibid)
*035  $aoai:nb.no:pliktmonografi_000043344
*035  $aoai:nb.no:pliktmonografi_000043344
*040  $aNO-OsNB$bnob$erda
*041 7$aeng$2MARC
*097  $aUkat
*24510$aEmpirical research on the whistleblowing process in Denmark, England, Ireland and Norway
*264 1$aOslo$bFafo$c2024
*300  $a4
*336  $atekst$0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAContentType/1020$2rdaco
*337  $adatamaskin$0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAMediaType/1003$2rdamt
*338  $aonline (nettilkoblet) ressurs$0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDACarrierType/1018$2rdact
*347  $atekstfil$0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/fileType/1002$2rdaft
*347  $bPDF
*520  $aIn this brief, we present results from workers who have observed wrongdoing and their actions and experiences thereafter. The results are part of a study entitled ’Workers’ voice and the right to manage – the case of whistleblowing in a comparative context’.1 At the time that our research was conducted, whistleblowing was protected by general legislation in England, Ireland and Norway, but not in Denmark. The EU Directive on Whistleblowing (2019/1937) has subsequently been transposed into Danish and Irish national law.
*655 7$aRapporter$0(uri)https://id.nb.no/vocabulary/ntsf/1775$2ntsf3$_202784200
*85640$uhttps://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-nb_pliktmonografi_000043344$3Fulltekst$yNettbiblioteket$zDigital representasjon
*913  $aNorbok$bNB
*999  $aoai:nb.bibsys.no:999920608588302202$b2025-04-03T00:03:27Z$z999920608588302202
^